|
10 points
|
20 points
|
30 points
|
40 points
|
50 points
|
Total
|
Follows Directions:
|
Not required amount of slides, or items on the poster
|
No photos
|
Photos and 1 or more internet sources
|
Photos, 1 or more internet sources and 1 book*
|
Multiple photos, internet sources, and book sources
|
|
Project Creativity:
|
No theme and no creativity producing this project
|
|
There is a theme, but it still looks shabby
|
|
Lots of time was put into this project; themes, hand work, style…
|
|
Student Presentation:
|
Froze and didn’t present their project
|
Spoke in a monotonous voice and pointed at the “pretty pictures”
|
Appears to have SOME interest or knowledge in their mathematician
|
Is able to entertain the class with dialogue rather than quoting everything from their poster
|
Is eloquent in their presentation. They talk as if they know their mathematician
|
|
Bibliography:
|
No Bibliography
|
|
Bibliography is done, but incorrectly
|
|
Bibliography is done neatly, alphabetically, and is easy to read
|
|
Extra Credit:
(10 points each item)
|
10 points
Sounds to slides, “scrapbooking” to posters
|
10 points
Other media sources;
comic book, e-mail from mathematician, etc.
|
10 points
“Attention grabber” during presentation
|
10 points
Was able to answer valid questions pertaining to mathematician
|
10 points
Could actually perform or explain the mathematics, does a demonstration
|
|
Total:
|
|